Who Did You Call?
Total Votes: 14
Who Did You Email
Total Votes: 11
While the democratic national party leadership wrings its hands over FL and MI and allows the media to have a field day with the whole situation, there is a real solution that is fair to all parties.
Ask the Carter Center to come in and mediate a solution between all involved parties. That's what the Carter Center does, well its one of the things the Carter Center does. And it does it very well too.
The Carter Center has been in operation for 25 years now. Founded in 1982 by former Democratic President, Jimmy Carter and his wife Rosalynn Carter, the Carter Center helps resolve conflict in the world. Its mission statement calls for the prevention and resolution of conflict as well as the enhancement of democracy.
The Carter Center lists dozens of elections that it has been involved in. From small local elections in China, to elections in South American Countries and the Mideast, former President Jimmy Carter and his team have developed a reputation for fairness. The Carter Center Democracy Program claims to have assisted 69 elections in 27 countries. They will only become involved in an election if they are invited.
The Democracy Program describes its duties on the Center Website:
___________________________________
Before an election, Carter Center observers meet with election officials and party leaders to discuss electoral procedures. Sometimes they mediate election disputes and help all sides to agree on election rules. During this phase, assessments are made of the voter registration process, voter education efforts, and the fairness of the campaign "field of play."
On election day, observers are dispatched with systematic survey forms to urban and rural areas to witness preparations at poll openings, voting, and vote counting to try to determine whether the vote was secret and fair at the sites they visited. In addition to talking with polling site officials and party witnesses, observers talk with citizens and note any complaints.
After polls close, delegates observe the counting of votes and the delivery of ballot boxes. Then, the entire delegation meets to discuss its observations and issue a statement of findings as a group. If necessary, qualified high-level observers can serve as mediators to facilitate the peaceful transfer of power.
___________________________________
Barack Obama has called America to a new kind of politics. He has called for a politics of bringing people together and solving our problems by sitting down at the table with all involved parties and working out solutions. The problems of super delegates and the FL, MI primaries could derail the Democratic nomination process. If there were ever a problem in politics that demanded all sides to come together and find an equitable and peaceful solution this is it.
The Carter Center specializes in mediating and observing election processes. But, they will not become involved unless invited. The leadership of Democratic National Party seems to be doing nothing but wringing its hands over the whole mess. Barack Obama's campaign is focused on uniting this country and solving problems by consensus. That is why he has so much appeal with so many people.
We (constituents of the Democratic Party) have a vested interest in moving beyond the division of this primary season – we've every right and responsibility to take charge of our own party. So, I've a few suggestions:
On Monday morning:
1. Call Barack Obama's campaign headquarters. Request that they ask the leadership of the Democratic National Party to invite the Carter Center for the purpose of mediating a solution to the FL and MI primary problem. Obama Campaign Headquarters: (866) 675-2008 - once the voice system starts in press 6 to speak with a volunteer.
2. Call The Democratic National Party headquarters. Request that they invite the Carter Center into this process for purposes of mediating a solution to the FL and MI primary problem. The phone number is: (202) 863-8000
3. Call Democracy For America. Request that they call on the Democratic National Party to invite the Carter Center into this process for purposes of mediating a solution to the FL and MI primary process. The phone number is: (802) 651-3200
4. Use the weekend to email all your friends and relatives about this plan. Link them to this article. Let's draft the Carter Center for an equitable solution to this problem and live up to the hope of Barack Obama's campaign – that America can move beyond the divisive politics of the past.
5. Use this weekend to link this article to every website you can think of who would have an honest interest in a fair and equitable solution to this problem.
6. If anyone knows the phone number for MoveOn.org (3.3 million members we can tap into) or any other phone numbers we can flood on Monday morning, post them here. Let's draft the Carter Center and bring this problem to a fair solution for all.
7. Call Nancy Pelosi's office. She came out in the press this morning asking Clinton and Obama to settle down. The number to her office is: (202) 225-4965 Tell her, inviting the Carter Center in to mediate a solution the FL and MI mess is something EVERY democrat would respect.
8. One person emailed me contact information for the Carter Center - it follows: Carter Center is (404) 420-5100 or (800) 550-3560, website is http://www.cartercenter.org , and email address is carterweb@emory.edu
___________________________
Edit - 03/13/2008
Hello Everyone:
Thank you for making phone calls, sending emails and contributing to this article with your comments. In addition to all the public comments - there have been private communications as well. What I'd like to say here - is that some things may unfold within the next few days. So, I'm going to ask all of you (who have been working so hard and been so enthusiastic about the Carter Center option) to stand down for a bit. At this point I believe, very deeply, that we need to take a wait and see attitude.
I know this must be coming out of left-field for you - but I'm going to ask you to trust what I am saying. I didn't start this whole thing easily. It is not in my character to get this deeply involved in politics, but something just kept at me about this situation and so I took action, when I never have before. I really want to thank all of you who have made phone calls, sent emails, and gotten involved in this effort. Your time has not been wasted. We worked together and lived up to Barack Obama's expectations of us:
I'm asking you to believe, not just in my ability to bring about real change in Washington ... I'm asking you to believe in yours.
We believed in our ability, and I honestly feel it made a difference. Thank you all for everything you have done and for all of your enthusiasm.
To summarize: There are some things that may unfold within the next few days. So, I'm going to ask all of you to stand down from pursuing the Carter Center option for a bit. At this point I believe, very deeply, that we need to take a wait and see attitude.
In Peace:
Pavilion
Why no reference to calling Hillary's HQ as well, hmmm? Your trolling is weak, grasshopper.
Why on earth would one suppose that Democratic Party members call on the supposedly good offices of Jimmy Carter to handle something that is entirely a party matter? Had they adopted the sensible position and merely penalized MI and FL for jumping the gun by cutting the number of delegates across the board those two states could contribute as did the GOP they wouldn't be facing this trainwreck. The Democratic Party made this mess for itself, they can clean it up.
Well, what is your solution to the problem? It would seem to me the main issues involve who would pay for a revote in MI and FL? The party? The states? The candidates?
The DNC did not create the problem. The people in the states did. They knew the rules and made a conscious decision to violate them. They "did not care." Why did they "not care"? Maybe because they count on this happening? They should not be rewarded for opposing the rules intentionally.
They should not be rewarded for opposing the rules intentionally.
Absolutely.
However, there is no DNC rule that states that valid primaries or caucuses can't still be held in Florida or Michigan. Maybe the Democratic Committees in those states should be fund raising to pay for a proper apportioning of delegates? Instead of whining about it?
Otherwise, the DNC rules prevail.
There is no good solution for this and it will not matter very much. The race is close and even adding Florida and Michigan would change little. Redoing them would change little. The superdelegates will decide this so the best idea would be forget about it and let the democratic convention decide.
I am neutral, or I'm against all three still running, Obama, Clinton, McCain. I'm not sure if this mess can be straightened out but I do think the Carter Center would be one of the best to try. It could not hurt. I'm not ma democrat-or republican- so I have no vested interest in who wins. But for a democrat I can see that a quick resolution to the nomination contest would help the party in November.
It is my opinion that it was the governors of both states that made the bad decisions! They were anxious to have their states participate earlier than scheduled. Therefore they took it upon themselves to moved up their dates. They were told of the consequences and said whatever....Michigan should have known there would be a problem when only one democratic candidate was on the ballot. They did not care! The people were told it would not count and so many did not vote. In Florida, only Clinton showed up for a Town meeting. I believe they both had advertising that overlapped in the area, but no paid advertising was done for either location. Florida's governor himself said he wasn't going to listen to the DNC and there are always ways to get around things! His angle from the start was to cause disaray in the democratic party. He endorsed John McCain prior to the Florida election. My point is that both states knew the rules and broke the rules. They were told of the consequences. The people of the state may be upset because they were told their votes would not count, therefore they were not given the chance to vote. I know some did vote, but the majority did not vote! I don't think the people are concerned about who gets seated at the DNC. I think the states should sponsor and pay for their own elections! Maybe next time they will play by the rules. If they get away with it this time, other states will try the same thing next election season......Discipline is the best choice!
I agree with your thoughts on the Carter Center. If there is another election, it definetly needs to be monitored by outsiders.
The people in the states need to be mad. They need to be telling their elected officials of their concerns. They should have done this before the elections were held. Both states voted on the rules of the DNC and then chose to not abide by the rules. This is why I think that the DNC should not have to pay and that the states should pay! The DNC did not break the rules, the states did! The DNC is only trying to enforce the rules. If they don't enforce the rules what do you think will happen next election season, the same or worse? Disciplinary action must be in enforced. Penalties must be paid. Perhaps the DNC could pay with exchange for 5th degree felony charges being brought towards both governors for voting tampering!
Just my opinion...justice must start somewhere...
Here's my solution that allows them representation but does not reward them for not following the rules like the other states did. Divide their delegates straight down the middle for each candidate-50% each. This formula doesn't allow them to influence or change the race but stops the main argument they are running with that their states should be represented. Let's seat them this way and be done with this discussion.
That would make the delegates happy. They could attend the Party! What about the people of the state that did not get a chance to vote because they were told their vote would not count? Why should several people be awarded at the expense of millions? I would think it would be more constitutional for the peoples rights to vote over who attends a party!
Seems to me like the citizens of PA ought to be upset that their governor is willing to help raise funds for primaries in two other states when his own suffers from financial problems.
If I lived in PA, I'd be verrry unhappy and let him know. Corzine sure has a lot of gaul.
I just called Obama's campaign and the Democratic Party. I talked to a live body both places. Obama's campaign sounded like they were actually taking notes and were very receptive. Democratic Party didn't ask my name, or anything else. I think they didn't want to be bothered. I think that perhaps this idea needs to be sent to other news sources to gain any strength. Just an FYI, I don't have a problem with no do-over in my state of MI. I agree that the rules were broken and there are and should be consequences. But, if there is going to be a do-over I want it to be impartial and fair.
The decision to break the rules here in Michigan was made by the 80 member Michigan Democratic Party Central Committee (MDPCC). The vote was 79-1. There was no request for input from either voters or members of the Michigan Democratic Party (MDP). Many of the Central Committee members are not directly elected to that office, but are there by virtue of holding some other office, much like the super delegates, which in fact they are. A large number of them are declared supporters of Senator Clinton, and many of the rest have a history of supporting her. Such is the nature of the undemocratic nature of the Democratic party. This is precisely why the party has stagnated. The back rooms may no longer be smoke filled, but they are most certainly filled with good ol' backslapping boys and girls who have little regard for the opinions of the working class of America. In all fairness, I must cut the Central Committee some slack here, in that they made this decision when many observers considered Senator Clinton to be the presumtive nominee. But I cut them no slack whatsoever when some of them state that this was a fair and legal primary. It was NOT and they have created a mess that does great harm to the party and the democratic process.
The only solution that will be acceptable to the voters of Michigan would include a real contest with a real vote. That may be a hard sell to the various parties with a vested interest.
My personal choice is the "firehouse vote" option, so long as it includes an absentee provision. That is the least expensive and could be put together fairly fast. I think many venues could be had for free or just cleanup charges. The polling would be run by the same folks, using the same equipment as a regular primary.
Under the present party rules and state laws, there is no way to prevent new crossovers, but those who voted in the Republican primary should be excluded.
I called the Obama campaign headquarters, and they seemed very interested in this idea. The volunteer I spoke with mentioned receiving other calls. I took that as a good sign. I also called the DNC, and the result was not as positive. The woman who I spoke to said that the campaigns and state parties needed to work out the details within the rules. I also tried to reach Nancy Pelosi's office, but got voice mail. I will continue to call her this week.
I strong advocate making the calls. Momentum is developing to have a re-vote. It must be fair and transparent, and monitored by a neutral party would be ideal.
Why does the DNC have to negotiate? They made the rules with the input of everyone. The people in those states knew the rules and intentionally violated them. What is there to negotiate? Any concession they get sets the precedent that the "rules" are not rules but imaginary guidelines.
Did you know that Jimmy Carter is a superdelegate?
As such, he has a decision to make. Could his predilection for one candidate or another directly or indirectly effect efforts made by the Carter Center?
Please understand - my efforts here are not intended to be seen as supporting a re-vote. I just simply see what's being played out by the power brokers - and if it comes to that - I want it done honestly and fairly.
I agree, I think we all want that.
I did not see Jimmy Carter's name on the superdelegate endorsement list, so I assume he has not yet endorsed. BTW, here's the entire Democratic superdelagtes list.
Oh - and the more you comment and vote on this article the better the chances of moving it "up the vine" so that others can see and act on it. Thanks
You read this, read it again. This is important. Vote!
We "all" do not want a solution. The party bosses in the two states chose to violate the rules. Let them fully suffer the consequences. The party members in those states knew that the rules were being violated and chose to smugly go along with the party bosses. If the rank and file had said something, this would not have happened. Now they want to say "Oops, our bad" and get a do over. It should NOT happen.
Dr Know, I agree with you completely. And my assumption is that the Carter Commission (or whatever it will be called) will come to the same conclusion. The DNC has set rules, they were ratified, FL and MI decided to break them, now they must deal with the consequences.
I see this as a way to validate and support to the current rules, not to circumvent them.
Then again, being human, I'm not always right.
I have another question. This is a problem for the people in two states. Why does everyone think it is their business to "fix" it? It is the sole business of the people in the states that clearly knew the rules, broke them, got a "ticket" and now everyone else wants the 'ticket' to be 'fixed'.
It is a wonder that anyone obeys any laws. Do we get to pick and choose which rules apply to us?
This is an excellent suggestion and I fully support it. Thanks for the post.
Thanks for the suggestion. Using your numbers I phoned the Carter Center, the DNC, the Obama Campaign, and the Clinton Campaign. I am waiting to hear back from the Carter Center. The Obama campaign wrote down my suggestions, thanked me, and mentioned that a few others had called as well. The DNC assistant to the Chairman thought it was a good idea and promised to pass it on to Howard Dean. The Clinton campaign was voice-menu driven. Nobody seems to be manning the ship and all voice-mail boxes were full except for Maggie Smith. When I pushed her number, I got Mark Penn's recording and a new number to call. I called that number and got someone named Bobby who was not at headquarters, but in a meeting. I quickly gave him the suggestion, but I'm not sure where it is going to end up. Hope someone else has better luck.
It now looks like Michigan will have a primary in June; Florida is still undecided.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |